Actually, I will concede one thing to Greenwald: I've been opposed to prosecuting the Bush miscreants--for political reasons, mostly. The President has put an awful lot of important domestic and foreign business on the table and this whole issue of what went on under Bush, and is no longer happening now, is a diversion from getting the important stuff done.
The initial point is right: Obama has a lot to do, and it makes no sense on the political or policy fronts for his White House to be out on the frontlines with pitchforks over Bush and friends' war crimes. HOWEVER, Klein's conclusion -- that this should totally rule out prosecutions, and a "look forward not backward" approach should be a blanket one over the entire government -- is terrible. The Department of Justice and the Senate Judiciary Committee can still pick through this and present their findings to, like, the people that you typically present findings to.
I agree that Obama, and by extension, Gibbs, should be paying this scant heed in briefings and press conferences. In theory, I might personally wish he would lay down the fucking law one time; "We're going to treat Yoo with all the care afforded to William Wallace." Yet I think anyone can agree it just doesn't make sense for him to be leading on this.
But I still think there should be investigations and prosecutions. I don't think these two ideas should be unreconcilable.
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy